Randomness Guide to London - Differences between Version 44 and Version 40 of Cafe East, SE16 7LH
Version 44 | Version 40 |
---|---|
== Line 6 == | == Line 6 == |
Banh cuon (steamed rice wrappers stuffed with mushrooms and pork; £5.50) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/7092910349/ photo]</small> were fine, but bi cuon (pork skin rolls; £5.50) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/6946841244/ photo]</small> were fridge-cold and fairly flavourless. Goi cuon (summer rolls; £5) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/7092911187/ photo]</small> were similarly fridge-cold and also had an unusually low proportion of prawns and pork, with an increased quantity of vermicelli and lettuce used to bulk them out; they were also lacking in the fragrant herbs that might have gone some way to remedy their lack of flavour. |
Banh cuon (steamed rice wrappers stuffed with mushrooms and pork; £5.50) were fine, but bi cuon (pork skin rolls; £5.50) were fridge-cold and fairly flavourless. Goi cuon (summer rolls; £5) were similarly fridge-cold and also had an unusually low proportion of prawns and pork, with an increased quantity of vermicelli and lettuce used to bulk them out; they were also lacking in the fragrant herbs that might have gone some way to remedy their lack of flavour. |
== Line 8 == | == Line 8 == |
A main course of bun chay/vegetarian BCNTN (vermicelli with salad and vegetarian spring rolls; £7) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/6946842578/ photo]</small> was a generous portion, but the spring rolls were quite disappointing, with smooth wheatflour wrappers rather than the bubbly, crackly rice paper wrappers [[Kake]] had been hoping for, and a distinct flavour of tinned vegetables in the somewhat mushy filling. However, the com khau (marinated belly pork steak served on rice; £7.50) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/6946887192/ photo]</small> ordered by another member of our party was better-received, and certainly looked tasty. |
A main course of bun chay/bun cha nem thit nuong/BCNTN (vermicelli with salad and vegetarian spring rolls; £7) was a generous portion, but the spring rolls were quite disappointing, with smooth wheatflour wrappers rather than the bubbly, crackly rice paper wrappers [[Kake]] had been hoping for, and a distinct flavour of tinned vegetables in the somewhat mushy filling. |
== Line 10 == | |
Our final bill <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/7095614895/ photo]</small> came to £51, or £12.75/head, including tea and water. No indication was given on the bill of whether it already included a service charge. |
|
== Line 21 == | == Line 19 == |
* Photos of the menu as of April 2012: [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/6935097152/sizes/l/ page 1], [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/7081172175/sizes/l/ page 2], [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/7081175069/sizes/l/ page 3], [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/6935102952/sizes/l/ page 4], [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/6935104846/sizes/l/ page 5], [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/7081179271/sizes/l/ page 6], [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/6935106886/sizes/l/ page 7] |
* Photos of the takeaway menu as of February 2010: [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/4401787556/sizes/l/ page 1], [http://www.flickr.com/photos/kake_pugh/4401021321/sizes/l/ page 2] |
== Line 34 == | |
* [http://promisesandpie.wordpress.com/2014/09/20/cafe-east-pho/ Promises And Pie review] |
|
== Line 41 == | == Line 38 == |
edit_type='Minor tidying' |
edit_type='Normal edit' |
== Line 43 == | == Line 40 == |
formatted_website_text=' class="external">cafeeast.co.uk' host='2a00:1098:86:4d:c0ff:ee:15:900d' |
formatted_website_text='http://www.cafeeast....' host='81.187.166.218' |
== Line 46 == | == Line 43 == |
latitude='51.496389' |
latitude='51.495875' |
== Line 48 == | == Line 45 == |
longitude='-0.041593' major_change='0' |
longitude='-0.040004' major_change='1' |
== Line 60 == | == Line 57 == |
summary='Vietnamese canteen in Surrey Quays.' |
summary='Small cafe in Surrey Quays (used to be in Deptford) serving good, authentic Vietnamese food.' |
Vietnamese cafe/restaurant in the Surrey Quays shopping/leisure complex, near the cinema. Previously situated on Evelyn Street in Deptford, it moved to Surrey Quays in Spring 2009, with the original premises now housing another Vietnamese cafe, Mama Pho, run by another member of the same family.
In complete contrast to the old street-corner cafe, the new location is large and canteen-like, with bright lighting, hard echoey surfaces, and thin paper tablecloths. There's a small waiting area near the entrance, with a ticketing system used to control waiting times — it's very popular with students, and gets very busy.
Kake and friends visited on a Wednesday evening in April 2012. The place was full, but we had only a short wait for a table. Even though no music was playing, it was very noisy, with the full room and hard surfaces conspiring to make it a little difficult to hear one's companions.
Banh cuon (steamed rice wrappers stuffed with mushrooms and pork; £5.50) were fine, but bi cuon (pork skin rolls; £5.50) were fridge-cold and fairly flavourless. Goi cuon (summer rolls; £5) were similarly fridge-cold and also had an unusually low proportion of prawns and pork, with an increased quantity of vermicelli and lettuce used to bulk them out; they were also lacking in the fragrant herbs that might have gone some way to remedy their lack of flavour.
A main course of bun chay/bun cha nem thit nuong/BCNTN (vermicelli with salad and vegetarian spring rolls; £7) was a generous portion, but the spring rolls were quite disappointing, with smooth wheatflour wrappers rather than the bubbly, crackly rice paper wrappers Kake had been hoping for, and a distinct flavour of tinned vegetables in the somewhat mushy filling.
It's worth noting that as of April 2012 they are cash only and they don't serve tap water, only bottled mineral water. Also worth noting is that they close up and go on holiday for a month or so every year, generally around August/September.
Kake's verdict: I was a bit disappointed. I'd had the pho at the previous location (in 2007) and thought it was really good, so I'd been expecting the quality to be maintained. I didn't like the ambience in the current location half as much as in the old place, and the food on this visit wasn't good enough to make up for it.
Accessibility: There is step-free access, but this involves negotiating a very steep ramp and a sharp turn.
See also:
- Photos of the takeaway menu as of February 2010: page 1, page 2
- The Observer review (Jay Rayner)
- Chowhound thread (covers both the old and new locations)
- A Rather Unusual Chinaman review
- Bellaphon's review
- Cheap Eats In London review
- Cheese and Biscuits review
- Eat Drink Sleep Shop review
- Eternally Neurotic review
- Food Stories review
- Gluttonous Sins review
- Hollow Legs review
- Not Another Big Menu review
- thecattylife review
- Wild Boar review
List all versions