Edit "Ping Pong, EC4M 9BE"
Cancel edit
About your edit
Your username (
set it
):
Comment about your changes:
Type of edit:
Normal edit
Minor tidying
Main information
Content: (see also
text formatting help
)
Dim sum restaurant in [[Locale St Paul's|St Paul's]], part of a small "modern-style" chain with branches [[Ping Pong, W1T 1QQ|on Goodge Street]] and [[Ping Pong, W1F 7JL|in Soho]], among other places. [[Kake]] and [http://tamarindandthyme.wordpress.com/ Su-Lin] visited on a Thursday evening in March 2011. We hadn't booked, and there were already quite a few people in, but there was no problem finding us a table. Unfortunately, in contrast to [[Kake]]'s previous experience at [[Ping Pong, W1T 1QQ|their Goodge Street location]], nothing we ordered was very good, and some of it was actively bad. Even setting quality aside, the food was a bit odd for a dim sum place — very few pork options, no chicken/mushrooms in the lotus leaf rice, and as Su-Lin points out in her review (linked below), there seemed to be carrot in <i>everything</i>. The menu was more restricted than at the other location, so we ended up mostly with various steamed dumplings. These were all over-steamed, leaving the wrappers mushy, sticky, and rather structurally unsound. The worst of these was the golden vegetable dumplings (£3.69 for three) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/su-lin/5593649190/ photo]</small> — the turmeric in the wrapper was overwhelmingly woody, and neither of us could bring ourselves to eat the last one. The best of a bad lot was likely the chicken and prawn dumplings (£4) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/su-lin/5593060575/ photo]</small>; the red cabbage juice used to give a purple colour to the wrappers was attractive and not intrusive, and the filling was quite juicy. Crispy prawn balls (£4) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/su-lin/5593647130/ photo]</small> were fried competently, but the filling was a bit salty. Fish and black pepper griddled dumplings (£3.59) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/su-lin/5593651986/ photo]</small> were OK, though the filling was quite dry. Perhaps the best part of the meal was the mango pudding with coconut cream (£3.19) <small>[http://www.flickr.com/photos/su-lin/5593655400/ photo]</small>; the unsweetened coconut cream was a nice foil to the sweetness of the mango. With a 12.5% service charge auto-added to our bill, and a glass of tea apiece, we paid £20/head, which is quite a lot of money for such a low standard of food. [[Kake]]'s verdict: Very disappointing. Accessibility: Step-free to get in, to get to most of the seating area, and to get to the toilets (including a dedicated accessible one). Some of the seating is on a dais, up a few steps, but there are plenty of other tables at ground level. See also: * [http://tamarindandthyme.wordpress.com/2011/04/06/ping-pong-so-wrong/ Tamarind And Thyme review of our visit] * [http://web.archive.org/web/20101115172550im_/http://www.squaremeal.co.uk/restaurants/london/view/89967/Ping_Pong_Bread_Street Square Meal review] <div class="last_verified">Last visited by [[Kake]] and Su-Lin, March 2011.</div>
Locales (one per line) (
view all locales in a new window)
:
City EC4 Mansion House St Paul's
Categories (one per line) (
view all categories in a new window)
:
Accessible Toilet Chinese Food Dim Sum Restaurants Step-Free Access
One-line summary of this page (for search results):
Additional information
Phone:
Website:
Twitter name (e.g. rglondon):
Opening hours:
Address:
Postcode:
OS X coordinate (e.g. 528113):
OS Y coordinate (e.g. 179347):
Map link:
Image to illustrate this page
URL of image:
Photos should be no larger than 240x240
Name of image copyright holder:
URL of image licence:
URL of image's info page:
Cancel edit