Randomness Guide to London - Differences between Version 14 and Version 13 of Ragam, W1T 4JN

Version 14 Version 13
== Line 13 == == Line 13 ==
* [https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2006/may/27/restaurants.restaurants Guardian review] (Matthew Norman)
* [https://www.timeout.com/london/restaurants/ragam Time Out review]
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2006/may/27/restaurants.restaurants Guardian review] (Matthew Norman)
* [http://www.timeout.com/london/restaurants/reviews/6164.html Time Out review]
== Line 16 ==
* [http://www.london-eating.co.uk/5420.htm London Eating comments]
== Line 17 == == Line 18 ==
<div class="last_verified">Last visited by [[Kat]], June 2017.</div>
<div class="last_verified">Last visited by [[Kat]], 1 June 2017.</div>
== Line 19 == == Line 20 ==
category='Curry,Good Curry Guide 2007,Indian Food,Keralan Food,Needs New Photo,Restaurants,South Indian Food'
edit_type='Minor tidying'
category='Curry,Good Curry Guide 2007,Indian Food,Keralan Food,Restaurants,South Indian Food'
edit_type='Normal edit'
== Line 23 == == Line 24 ==
host='81.187.166.218'
host='82.69.97.246'
== Line 28 == == Line 29 ==
major_change='0'
major_change='1'

Restaurant in Fitzrovia, serving South Indian and Keralan food.

In the 2007 Good Curry Guide.

The restaurant was nearly empty when Kat visited on a Thursday evening in April 2009 after work. The utthappam (a lentil and rice 'pizza' with chopped chillis cooked into it) was big enough to make me glad I hadn't ordered a starter, and hot enough to make my nose start running (in a good way). The price was as pleasant as the food — the most expensive dish on the specialities menu was around £5. They also offered cans of 'real' (i.e. cloudy) lemonade instead of the usual Sprite/7Up.

On Kat's return visit in June 2017, the (previously enormous) dosas had been relegated to the starters section of the menu. A lamb malabar (£8.50) and paratha (£3.20) was a tasty enough replacement. My starter of vada (a spicy lentil & ginger doughnut, £4) was probably the highlight though. The staff were friendly and happy to explain the menu, but a little inattentive.

itsbruce's verdict: The decor has improved a bit since Matthew Norman visited; the food is still wonderful.

Accessibility: a wide step to the door from the pavement, and a narrow turn to get in the door. The tables are quite close together inside. Didn't check the toilets.

See also:

Last visited by Kat, 1 June 2017.

List all versions